1. Главная
›
2. Архив
›
3. Вестник науки №6 (63) том 5
›
4. Научная статья № 52

  53 просмотров

Zarubaika Andrei

  

TECHNIQUES AND STRATEGIES FOR HANDLING HIGH TRAFFIC *

  

Аннотация:
the global fintech market is projected to experience significant growth, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.8% from 2021 to 2028, reaching a market size of USD 305.7 billion. As the demand for fintech services rises, the need for fintech APIs to facilitate integration between financial applications also increases. However, handling high traffic loads presents challenges to fintech companies, including performance issues, downtime, and service disruptions. This article explores various techniques and strategies for scaling fintech APIs to address these challenges. Caching, load balancing, auto-scaling, API gateways, asynchronous processing, distributed databases, and monitoring are discussed as key approaches to handle high traffic loads. Caching, implemented at different levels, accelerates API response times by storing frequently accessed data. Load balancing distributes traffic across multiple servers, improving performance and handling increased loads. Auto-scaling adjusts infrastructure capacity based on incoming traffic patterns, ensuring optimal resource utilization. API gateways act as reverse proxies, managing authentication, rate limiting, and caching, providing a centralized entry point for APIs. Asynchronous processing techniques, such as message queues and event-driven architectures, enable servers to handle multiple requests simultaneously. Distributed databases ensure scalability and fault tolerance by distributing data across multiple servers. To make informed decisions, the article provides a comparison of leading API gateways and highlights the top databases based on a StackOverflow survey. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of choosing a logging and monitoring solution separately from the scaling infrastructure, with a focus on long-term cost estimation and avoiding performance impact. By implementing these techniques and strategies, fintech companies can deliver seamless and reliable services to customers even during high traffic periods. Investing in scalable and reliable infrastructure becomes crucial for staying ahead in the growing fintech market   

Ключевые слова:
fintech, API scaling, caching, load balancing, auto-scaling, API gateways, asynchronous processing, distributed databases, monitoring   

УДК 004

Zarubaika Andrei

Senior Development Manager, Bank and ERP API connectivity,

Kyriba Corp, www.kyriba.com

(Miami, Florida, United States of America)

 

TECHNIQUES AND STRATEGIES FOR HANDLING HIGH TRAFFIC

 

Abstract: the global fintech market is projected to experience significant growth, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.8% from 2021 to 2028, reaching a market size of USD 305.7 billion. As the demand for fintech services rises, the need for fintech APIs to facilitate integration between financial applications also increases. However, handling high traffic loads presents challenges to fintech companies, including performance issues, downtime, and service disruptions. This article explores various techniques and strategies for scaling fintech APIs to address these challenges. Caching, load balancing, auto-scaling, API gateways, asynchronous processing, distributed databases, and monitoring are discussed as key approaches to handle high traffic loads. Caching, implemented at different levels, accelerates API response times by storing frequently accessed data. Load balancing distributes traffic across multiple servers, improving performance and handling increased loads. Auto-scaling adjusts infrastructure capacity based on incoming traffic patterns, ensuring optimal resource utilization. API gateways act as reverse proxies, managing authentication, rate limiting, and caching, providing a centralized entry point for APIs. Asynchronous processing techniques, such as message queues and event-driven architectures, enable servers to handle multiple requests simultaneously. Distributed databases ensure scalability and fault tolerance by distributing data across multiple servers. To make informed decisions, the article provides a comparison of leading API gateways and highlights the top databases based on a StackOverflow survey. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of choosing a logging and monitoring solution separately from the scaling infrastructure, with a focus on long-term cost estimation and avoiding performance impact. By implementing these techniques and strategies, fintech companies can deliver seamless and reliable services to customers even during high traffic periods. Investing in scalable and reliable infrastructure becomes crucial for staying ahead in the growing fintech market.

 

Keywords: fintech, API scaling, caching, load balancing, auto-scaling, API gateways, asynchronous processing, distributed databases, monitoring.

 

According to recent studies, the global fintech market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.8% from 2021 to 2028, reaching a market size of USD 305.7 billion by 2028 [1]. As the demand for fintech services continues to grow, so does the demand for fintech APIs, which enable seamless integration between different financial applications.

However, with the increase in demand for fintech APIs comes the challenge of handling high traffic loads. Without proper scaling techniques and strategies, fintech companies may experience performance issues, downtime, and even service disruptions, leading to dissatisfied customers and lost revenue.

One of the most effective techniques for scaling fintech APIs is caching. By caching frequently accessed data, API requests can be served faster, reducing the load on the server. Caching can be implemented at various levels, including client-side, server-side, and database level.

 Load balancing is another important technique for handling high traffic loads. By distributing traffic across multiple servers, fintech companies can improve performance and handle higher traffic loads. Load balancing can be implemented at the application or network level, and can be done using various techniques, including round-robin, least connections, and IP hash. Despite the fact that you will choose a leading load balancer for your solution, please pay attention to limitations, default configurations which are coming as part of the solutions, as they may decrease throughput of the entire solution. Based on statistics from the top 5 leading are [2]:

1. Azure Application Gateway
2. Citric ADC
3. KempLoadMaster
4. F5 NGINX Plus
5. HAProxy

 

 

Graph 1 - Trending API Load Balancers

 

Auto-scaling is a technique that enables the infrastructure to automatically adjust its capacity based on the incoming traffic. It involves setting up rules that trigger the addition or removal of servers based on traffic patterns. Auto-scaling can be implemented using cloud-based infrastructure services, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Microsoft Azure. Another alternative is to apply autoscaling design patterns, for example:

1. Trigger-based scaling: This pattern involves setting up triggers based on specific metrics, such as CPU usage or network traffic, and automatically scaling the system up or down based on those triggers.
2. Scheduled scaling: This pattern involves setting up a schedule for scaling, such as scaling up during peak hours and scaling down during off-peak hours.
3. Predictive scaling: This pattern involves using machine learning or other predictive algorithms to anticipate future traffic and automatically scale the system up or down accordingly.
4. Capacity-based scaling: This pattern involves setting up a minimum and maximum number of instances, and scaling up or down as needed to ensure that the system remains within those limits.
5. Service-based scaling: This pattern involves setting up different services with different scaling needs and scaling them independently of each other.
6. Hybrid scaling: This pattern involves combining multiple scaling strategies, such as trigger-based scaling and scheduled scaling, to create a more robust and flexible auto-scaling system. Fault-tolerant scaling: This pattern involves setting up a system that can automatically recover from failures by scaling up or down as needed to ensure that the system remains available and responsive.

API gateways are also essential for scaling fintech APIs. They act as a reverse proxy that routes requests to different services based on predefined rules, and can handle tasks such as authentication, rate limiting, and caching. API gateways provide a centralized entry point for APIs, making it easier to manage, monitor, and scale APIs.

 

Please find comparison between to 14 API gateways from geekflare [3]:

Table 1 - API gateways comparison

API Gateway	Language/Platform	Open Source	Key Features	Notable Users
Kong Gateway	Lua/Nginx	Yes	Authentication, Traffic Control, Analytics, Serverless, etc.	Nasdaq, Honeywell, Expedia, Samsung
Apache APISIX	Nginx/etcd	Yes	Dynamic Routing, Plug-in Hot Loading	360, NetEase, TravelSky
Tyk	Go	Yes	Authentication, Quotas, Rate Limiting, Monitoring, GraphQL	Self-hosted or managed, available on AWS
Ocelot	.NET	Yes	Routing, Authentication, Rate Limiting, Load Balancing	.NET-based microservices or SOA
Goku	Golang	Yes	Dynamic Routing, Service Orchestration, Multi-tenancy, etc.	EOLINK Inc.
Express Gateway	Express.js	Yes	Basic Features	Joyent, The Linux Foundation, Switch Media, etc.
Gloo	Envoy Proxy	Yes	Full-Featured, Developer Portal, WAF, Rate Limiting, etc.	Open-source or enterprise, advanced features
KrakenD	Golang	Yes	Ultra-high Performance, Aggregation, Transformation, etc.	Faster than Kong and Tyk
Fusio	PHP	Yes	Monetization, Subscription Support, OAI, RAML, Documentation	Simple and Intuitive Backend
WSO2	Java	Yes	Full Lifecycle API Management	Deployable anywhere, Kubernetes operator

 

 

Asynchronous processing is another technique that can help fintech companies handle high traffic loads. By processing requests in a non-blocking way, the server can handle more requests simultaneously, using techniques such as message queues, event-driven architectures, and microservices. Here are some of the most common asynchronous design patterns used in APIs:

1. Callbacks: A callback is a function that is passed as an argument to another function and is called when the operation is complete. Callbacks are a simple and widely used pattern for handling asynchronous operations in APIs.
2. Promises: A promise is an object that represents the eventual completion (or failure) of an asynchronous operation and allows you to attach callbacks to handle the results. Promises provide a cleaner and more concise way of handling asynchronous operations than callbacks.
3. Async/await: Async/await is a newer syntax that simplifies the use of promises by allowing you to write asynchronous code that looks like synchronous code. Async/await makes it easier to write and maintain asynchronous code, and it is becoming increasingly popular in modern APIs.
4. Reactive programming: Reactive programming is a programming paradigm that focuses on the propagation of change and the composition of asynchronous sequences of data. Reactive programming is often used in APIs that require real-time data processing and event-driven architectures.
5. Message queues: A message queue is a software component that allows you to decouple the processing of requests from the handling of responses. Message queues are often used in APIs that need to handle large volumes of requests and need to scale horizontally to handle spikes in traffic.

 

Distributed databases are designed to handle large volumes of data across multiple servers, providing scalability and fault tolerance. By distributing the data across multiple servers, distributed databases can handle high traffic loads and ensure reliability and data consistency. Based on StackOverflow survey top 5 leading databases are [4]:

1. MySQL
2. PostgreSQL
3. SQLite
4. MongoDB
5. Microsoft SQL Server

 

Graph 2 - Trending API distributed databases

 

Finally, monitoring and logging are essential for identifying issues and optimizing performance. By monitoring the API's performance, including response times, error rates, and traffic patterns, fintech companies can identify potential issues and take proactive measures to improve performance. As there are many-many solutions on the market, the suggestion is to look into the same brands for logging and monitoring and estimate the price for 3-5 years forward. Initially solutions look not expensive, the adoption costs about half of the year for the entire company. However, in a one or two-years period costs increase dramatically and automatically and you either should replace the vendor and invest about a year for adoption, or have to agree to paying an increasing price. The other suggestion is to never mix solution and observability systems. In other words, the performance of the solution shouldn’t be impacted by the observability system.

 

In conclusion, scaling fintech APIs requires a combination of techniques and strategies to handle high traffic loads. By implementing techniques such as caching, load balancing, auto-scaling, API gateways, asynchronous processing, distributed databases, and monitoring, fintech companies can provide seamless and reliable services to their customers, even under high traffic loads. As the fintech market continues to grow, it is essential for companies to stay ahead of the curve and invest in scalable and reliable infrastructure.

 

REFERENCES:

 

1. Smart Infrastructure Market (2022) [Web resource] // Access mode: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/smart-infrastructure-market-106346 (Accessed: May 16, 2023).
2. Load Balancing [Web resource] // Access mode: https://www.g2.com/categories/load-balancing#grid (Accessed: May 16, 2023).
3. Ali, A., 14 Open Source and Managed API Gateway for Modern Applications [Web resource] // Access mode: https://geekflare.com/api-gateway/ (Accessed: May 16, 2023).
4. Stack Overflow Annual Developer Survey (2023) [Web resource] // Access mode: https://survey.stackoverflow.co/ (Accessed: May 16, 2023).

  

Полная версия статьи PDF

Номер журнала Вестник науки №6 (63) том 5

  

Ссылка для цитирования:

Zarubaika Andrei TECHNIQUES AND STRATEGIES FOR HANDLING HIGH TRAFFIC // Вестник науки №6 (63) том 5. С. 323 - 330. 2023 г. ISSN 2712-8849 // Электронный ресурс: https://www.вестник-науки.рф/article/9377 (дата обращения: 17.05.2024 г.)

Альтернативная ссылка латинскими символами: vestnik-nauki.com/article/9377

---

Нашли грубую ошибку (плагиат, фальсифицированные данные или иные нарушения научно-издательской этики) ?
- напишите письмо в редакцию журнала: zhurnal@vestnik-nauki.com

Вестник науки СМИ ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 84401 © 2023.    16+

---

* В выпусках журнала могут упоминаться организации (Meta, Facebook, Instagram) в отношении которых судом принято вступившее в законную силу решение о ликвидации или запрете деятельности по основаниям, предусмотренным Федеральным законом от 25 июля 2002 года № 114-ФЗ 'О противодействии экстремистской деятельности' (далее - Федеральный закон 'О противодействии экстремистской деятельности'), или об организации, включенной в опубликованный единый федеральный список организаций, в том числе иностранных и международных организаций, признанных в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации террористическими, без указания на то, что соответствующее общественное объединение или иная организация ликвидированы или их деятельность запрещена.